ACTINOLITE
☐{Ca2}{Mg4.5-2.5Fe0.5-2.5}(Si8O22)(OH)2,
calcium magnesium iron silicate hydroxide
Actinolite is the intermediate member of a solid-solution series that extends from tremolite, a Ca-Mg amphibole, to ferro-actinolite, a Ca-Fe amphibole. The idealized chemical formulas for these species, with separators to more clearly indicate the chemical relationships, are as follows:
Generic formula: X Z Si8O22 (OH,F,Cl)2
Tremolite: Ca2 Mg5 Si8O22 (OH)2
Actinolite: Ca2 (Mg,Fe2+)5 Si8O22 (OH)2
Ferro-actinolite: Ca2 Fe5 Si8O22 (OH)2
The X crystallographic site in this amphibole series is dominated by Ca, as shown, and the Z site by Mg and Fe. If the Z site contains 90% or more Mg atoms - that is, if the Mg/(Mg+Fe2+) ratio exceeds 0.9 - the amphibole is termed tremolite. If instead the site contains less than 50% Mg atoms (and thus more than 50% Fe) it is termed ferro-actinolite. Actinolite as a species, then, by definition has an Mg/(Mg+Fe2+) ratio of 0.5-0.9.
It should be noted that the actual chemistry of the amphiboles is considerably more complex than the idealized formulas imply. The local amphiboles, especially those in and near the zinc orebodies, are often markedly impure, making it difficult to identify specimens to the species level. Comparison to analyzed specimens is helpful to a degree, but rigorously analyzed examples are few, leaving sight identification of the local amphiboles an almost hopeless proposition. Dunn (1995, p. 451) provided some general guidelines for distinguishing the various amphiboles, but it nevertheless remains true that correct identification to the species level is generally possible only by means of combined chemical-analytical and X-ray diffraction techniques. Many of the local amphiboles are best labeled, simply, amphibole.
Specimens known or inferred to be actinolite are common at Franklin, less so at Sterling Hill, and are most abundant in the gneisses of the calcium-silicate units. Actinolite occurs in various familiar habits: as coarse-grained masses; as large, prismatic crystals; as felted masses of fibrous crystals (the variety termed byssolite) enclosed in calcite; as dense masses of plumose radiating grains; and as a silky, fibrous mineral in various vein assemblages. Its color ranges from pale to dark green and pale brown. Outside the orebodies, much of the Franklin Marble is too iron-poor for actinolite to be present, with tremolite appearing instead, but silicate-rich gneisses within the marble unit may contain it.
References
Betancourt, P.B. (1989), The epidote-pyroxene-fluorapophyllite assemblage in the Franklin mine at Franklin, New Jersey. The Picking Table, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 8-10. [Mentions actinolite as a vein mineral in cavities with stilbite and epidote from the Franklin mine]
Craig, F.M. and Moritz, Harold (2024), Analysis of amphiboles from Sterling Hill, Ogdensburg, New Jersey, USA. The Picking Table, vol. 65, no. 1, p. 13-29. [Presents chemical analyses of nine amphibole specimens from Sterling Hill, three of them actinolite]
Dunn, P.J. (1995), Franklin and Sterling Hill, New Jersey: the world’s most magnificent mineral deposits. Privately published in five volumes, 755 pp. [Description of actinolite on p. 451-453; includes chemical analyses of seven specimens]
Dunn, P.J. and Peacor, D.R. (1984), Nelenite, a manganese arsenosilicate of the friedelite group, polymorphous with schallerite, from Franklin, New Jersey. Mineralogical Magazine, vol. 48, p. 271-275. [Description of a high-Fe actinolite from the nelenite assemblage at Franklin]
Fowler, Samuel (1825), An account of some new and extraordinary minerals discovered in Warwick, Orange County, N.Y. American Journal of Science, 1st Series, vol. 9, p. 242-245. [Describes amianthus from Franklin, regarded by Dunn (1995) as probably corresponding to actinolite]
Frondel, Clifford (1972), The minerals of Franklin and Sterling Hill - a check list. Wiley-Interscience, 94 pp. [Describes local actinolite on p. 39 as “not abundant” and remarks on its commonly elevated content of zinc and manganese]
Germine, M. and Puffer, J.H., 1989, Origin and development of flexibility in asbestiform fibres. Mineralogical Magazine, vol. 53, p. 327-335. [Reports a fibrous actinolite from Franklin with 3.8% Cr2O3]
King, V.T., King, N.E., Betancourt, P.P., Bostwick, R.C., Chin, P., Hecht, T.J., Kuitems, S.M., Moritz, H., Nemetz, J.D., Nikischer, A.J., Sanford, S., Van Fleet, J.A., and Verbeek, E.R. (2022), The Mineralogy of Franklin and Ogdensburg, New Jersey—A Photographic Celebration. Privately published, 1400 pp. [Photos of actinolite specimens shown on p. 757-758]
Klein, C. Jr. and Ito, J. (1968), Zincian and manganoan amphiboles from Franklin, New Jersey. American Mineralogist, vol. 53, p. 1264-1275. [Good discussion of the chemistry of the local amphiboles]
Koenig, G.A. (1887), On zinc-manganese asbestos. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, p. 47-48. [The asbestos described in this paper is regarded by Dunn (1995) as probably being fibrous actinolite]
Leake, B.E. (1978), Nomenclature of amphiboles. American Mineralogist, vol. 63, nos. 11 and 12, p. 1023-1052. [Extensive revisions to amphibole species names]
Leavens, P.B., Zullo, J., and Verbeek, E.R. (2009), A complex, genthelvite-bearing skarn from the Passaic Pit, Sterling Hill Mine, Ogdensburg, New Jersey. Axis, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1-26. [Detailed discussion of a retrograde metamorphic mineral assemblage from a calc-silicate zone adjacent to the footwall of the east limb of ore at Sterling Hill. Numerous specimen photos]
Nuttall, Thomas (1822), Observations and geological remarks on the minerals of Paterson and the valley of Sparta in New Jersey. American Journal of Science, 1st Series, vol. 5, p. 239-248. [First listing of actinolite as a mineral of the Franklin-Sterling Hill area]
Palache, Charles (1935), The minerals of Franklin and Sterling Hill, Sussex County, New Jersey. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 180, 135 pp. [Brief mention of actinolite, then regarded as a rare mineral locally, on pp. 71 and 115]
Images